Guidelines
Participation
in a structured process of professional collaboration like this can
be intimidating and anxiety producing, especially for the teacher presenting
student work. Having a shared set of guidelines or norms helps everybody
participate in a manner that is respectful as well as conducive to helpful
feedback. Below is one set of guidelines; teachers may want to create
their own. In any case, the group should go over the guidelines and
the schedule before starting the protocol. The facilitator must feel
free to remind participants of the guidelines and schedule at any time
in the process.
1. Be
respectful of presenters. By
making their work more public, teachers are exposing themselves to kinds
of critiques they may not be used to receiving. If inappropriate comments
or questions are posed, the facilitator should make sure they are blocked
or withdrawn.
2. Contribute
to substantive discourse. Resist
offering only blanket praise or silence. Without thoughtful, probing
questions and comments, the presenter will not benefit from the tuning
protocol.
3. Be
appreciative of the facilitator’s role, particularly
in regard to following the norms and keeping time. A tuning protocol
that doesn’t allow for all components (presentation, feedback,
response, debrief) to be enacted properly will do a disservice to the
teacher-presenters and to the participants.
4. Facilitators
need to keep the conversation constructive. There
is a delicate balance between feedback that only strokes and feedback
that does damage. It is the facilitator’s job to make sure that
balance is maintained. At the end of the session, the presenter should
be able to revise the work productively on the basis of what was said.
5. Don’t
skip the debrief. It
is tempting to move to the next item of business once the feedback section
is over. If you do that, the quality of responses will not improve and
the presenters will not get increasingly useful kinds of feedback.